Cao, L., Francis, E. (2003) Support Vector Machines with Adaptive Parameters in Financial Timeseries forecasting, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 14(6):1506:1518

svmPaper.PNG

Now here is a point of thought:  Support vector machines + Evolutionary Algorithms = ? 

On the surface, it appears that support vector machines beat neural networks in terms of maintaining generality on both in-sample and out of sample data when applied to forecasting.  But the problem is deciding what kernel function to use for a particular forecasting task using support vectors?  This problem in some ways is analogous to the choice of connectionist structure to use for a neural network.  Perhaps some kind of evolutionary algorithm can be applied to determine the best kernel function, given a population of kernel functions.  This might be an idea for an upcoming paper.